I am the ecological protectionist definition
The first time I heard of the word “ecological protection” I was shocked by the fact that I did not know where the word came from.
“Why does it sound so foreign?”
I was wrong.
In the UK, this is actually a perfectly natural word to use.
It means “protecting” or “protects” nature, and it is also used to describe the act of taking care of nature for the benefit of human beings.
In fact, a study found that British people use the word so much that in 2011 the UK government launched a new version of the term.
In the United States, the term has its origins in the early days of the environmental movement.
Back then, it meant a person who was concerned about the environment and was opposed to pollution.
The term was first used in the 1960s to describe environmental activists who were not willing to pay for the environmental damage caused by the pollution.
But over the years, as the environmental activists and environmentalists became increasingly prominent, the word became used to refer to those who did not agree with them.
Today, environmentalists often describe themselves as environmental protectionists, but it is a different word to what people originally meant when they used the word.
The term has evolved over the past several decades as environmental activists have been using it to describe people who oppose the environmentalism of the activists.
For example, the phrase “environmental justice” has been used to label those who take environmental issues seriously.
But environmentalists also use the term to describe those who oppose environmental legislation.
In other words, environmental protectionism is a term that is used by many different groups, but is typically used by environmentalists to describe activists who oppose their environmentalist views.
But the word has not always been a positive term.
In an interview with The Huffington Post, activist, poet and activist Gloria Steinem argued that the term was offensive.
“The term ‘environmental protectionist’ is a terrible word,” she said.
“It’s a very offensive word that’s associated with people who don’t care about the planet or care about human beings, and who use the language of protectionist.
And so when we use it, it’s really degrading.”
Steinem is one of many who have criticized the term environmental protectionist in recent years.
But the idea of using the word as a derogatory term to attack environmentalists has not gone unnoticed by environmentalists.
The Environmental Defense Fund, a major environmental organization, issued a statement this week saying that it “does not condone using the term ‘ecological’ to describe a person.”
In a 2014 poll by the Center for American Progress, nearly one in three Americans said they do not know the meaning of the terms “ecologically responsible” and “eco-friendly.”
And a Pew Research Center study published last month found that Americans tend to associate “environmentalist” and the term “environment” with environmentalists.
The word has come under increasing criticism in recent months from environmentalists who say it is harmful to the climate and the planet.
In November, a group of researchers at Yale University published a study claiming that the word environmentalism is “largely false, misleading, and inaccurate.”
The study found no scientific evidence supporting the claim that the environmental community is being portrayed as a “special interest group” that is “more interested in protecting the environment than protecting people and the environment.”
The group wrote that the phrase environmentalism has “little scientific basis, and many critics of the notion that the planet is being ‘polluted’ by global warming are using it as a convenient way to attack environmentalists.”
Follow Andrew on Twitter